Build with AI assistants that can’t lose the plot.
Floweav treats your project’s graph as the source of truth. AI proposes typed mutations against that graph — never writing files directly. Duplicates, orphans, and broken references become structurally impossible.
propose → validate → commit
The problem
AI assistants forget. Floweav remembers.
A coding assistant without a source of truth drifts. It writes duplicate functions it forgot existed, leaves orphan files behind, breaks references it can’t see. Floweav makes drift impossible by treating the graph itself as the contract.
6 files, no source of truth. Two functions named render(), three orphans, broken imports.
Same files. Validated graph. Duplicates rejected at commit. Every implementation traces to an intent.
How it works
Three steps, one source of truth.
Define intent. Let the agent propose. Validate, preview, commit. The graph is always the source; code is always derived.
Define what you're building
Drop an Intent node into the graph. It becomes the root every implementation must trace back to. Floating implementations are rejected at validate time.
AI proposes typed mutations
Claude can only call typed mutation tools — AddNode, Connect, Rename, SetProperty. Never writes files. Each proposal validates against the schema before you ever see it.
Validate, preview, commit
Approved mutations render as ghost overlays over the live graph. Hit commit, and the generator emits real code (TypeScript + SQL for Next.js + Supabase) deterministically.
The foundation
Three principles, locked.
Graph-as-truth
A typed property graph is the canonical project state. Every node and edge validates against the schema before commit.
Propose-only AI
The agent's only verbs are typed mutations. It cannot write files, run commands, or take any action outside the validated set.
Verified intents
Implementation nodes must satisfy a stated user goal. Claude Haiku 4.5 verifies each connected subgraph after every commit.